Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Sport & Social Issues
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Urquhart, J.
Right arrow Articles by Crossman, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Globe and Mail Coverage of the Winter Olympic Games

A Cold Place for Women Athletes

Jim Urquhart

Jane Crossman

Lakehead University in Thunder Bay, Ontario

This research is a content analysis by gender of the Globe and Mail’s coverage of the Winter Olympic Games from 1924 to 1992. Variables examined with respect to gender included: size and type of article/picture, sport, location, and source of article. One-way ANOVA and ANOVA with a Student-Newman-Keuls procedure were used to determine if significant differences existed between the above indices. The study found that female athletes were under-represented when compared to male athletes and women were frequently depicted in "sex appropriate" sports. Male athletes were written about four times (647 to 144) as much, and photographed three times (346 to 131) as much as females. The mean size of articles about female athletes was significantly larger than the articles about male athletes (F(1,6) = 5.41, p = .001). Women received less print space from 1924 to 1960 and more from 1964 to 1992. Articles were written by male reporters almost six times (431 to 75) more frequently than female reporters. Reasons for the findings are discussed.

Journal of Sport & Social Issues, Vol. 23, No. 2, 193-202 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/0193723599232006


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Sport and Social IssuesHome page
J. Stone and J. Horne
The Print Media Coverage of Skiing and Snowboarding in Britain: Does It Have To Be Downhill All the Way?
Journal of Sport and Social Issues, February 1, 2008; 32(1): 94 - 112.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Review for the Sociology of SportHome page
P. M. Pedersen
Examining Equity in Newspaper Photographs: A Content Analysis of the Print Media Photographic Coverage of Interscholastic Athletics
International Review for the Sociology of Sport, December 1, 2002; 37(3-4): 303 - 318.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Review for the Sociology of SportHome page
J. Vincent, C. Imwold, V. Masemann, and J. T. Johnson
A Comparison of Selected 'Serious' and 'Popular' British, Canadian, and United States Newspaper Coverage of Female and Male Athletes Competing in the Centennial Olympic Games: Did Female Athletes Receive Equitable Coverage in the 'Games of the Women'?
International Review for the Sociology of Sport, December 1, 2002; 37(3-4): 319 - 335.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Review for the Sociology of SportHome page
J. Harris and B. Clayton
Femininity, Masculinity, Physicality and the English Tabloid Press: The Case of Anna Kournikova
International Review for the Sociology of Sport, December 1, 2002; 37(3-4): 397 - 413.
[Abstract] [PDF]