Journal of Sport & Social Issues

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pringle, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Sport & Social Issues, Vol. 29, No. 3, 256-278 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0193723505276228

Masculinities, Sport, and Power

A Critical Comparison of Gramscian and Foucauldian Inspired Theoretical Tools

Richard Pringle

Although feminists have increasingly found Foucauldian theorising effective for examining issues associated with female sport and exercise contexts, the Gramscian-inspired concept of masculine hegemony remains dominant in masculinities research. This article compares and contrasts the theoretical tools stemming from the writings of Gramsci and Foucault with respect to their use for examining sport and masculinities. It is argued that it is troublesome to combine Foucauldian and Gramscian concepts without acknowledging fundamental theoretical differences. Questions of concern are also discussed with respect to how the concept of hegemonic masculinity has been used in studies of sport and masculinities. It is suggested that the concept of masculine hegemony does not simply refer to a dominant form of masculinity but is underpinned by particular understandings of power that some may find problematic. The conclusion discusses how Foucauldian theorising could be advantageous for future examinations of sport and masculinities.

Key Words: Gramsci • Foucault • hegemonic masculinities • power • discourse


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Sport and Social IssuesHome page
H. Thorpe
Foucault, Technologies of Self, and the Media: Discourses of Femininity in Snowboarding Culture
Journal of Sport and Social Issues, May 1, 2008; 32(2): 199 - 229.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Sport and Social IssuesHome page
J. Stone and J. Horne
The Print Media Coverage of Skiing and Snowboarding in Britain: Does It Have To Be Downhill All the Way?
Journal of Sport and Social Issues, February 1, 2008; 32(1): 94 - 112.
[Abstract] [PDF]