Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to browse AJSM online!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Sport & Social Issues
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hartmann, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Rush Limbaugh, Donovan McNabb, and "A Little Social Concern"

Reflections on the Problems of Whiteness in Contemporary American Sport

Douglas Hartmann

University of Minnesota

This article offers an interpretative case study of the controversy that surrounded Rush Limbaugh’s comments about Philadelphia Eagles quarterback Donovan McNabb near the beginning of the 2003 National Football League season. Informed by critical race theory, the analysis argues that Limbaugh’s remarks were a textbook example of how the rhetoric of Whiteness operates to assert the cultural normativity of the dominant group and legitimate its privilege. That sport leaders and commentators roundly rejected Limbaugh’s comments and pushed for his removal gives the impression that the sporting establishment was unusually progressive and enlightened on these issues. However, closer reading and basic content analysis suggests that the ideas mobilized to put Limbaugh in his place—specifically those involving the supposed sanctity and colorblindness of sport—were in many ways complicit with Limbaugh’s own White supremacy. Consideration of the market forces that allowed Limbaugh’s hiring implicates sport even further. Lessons for Whiteness theory, White supremacy, and the relationships between them are discussed.

Key Words: sport culture • Whiteness studies • colorblindness • critical race theory

Journal of Sport & Social Issues, Vol. 31, No. 1, 45-60 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0193723506296831


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
International Review for the Sociology of SportHome page
K. Spracklen and C. Spracklen
Negotiations of Being and Becoming: Minority Ethnic Rugby League Players in the Cathar Country of France
International Review for the Sociology of Sport, June 1, 2008; 43(2): 201 - 218.
[Abstract] [PDF]